
GPTZero
代替候補のひとつ
Check writing for AI-associated patterns and review sentence-level findings
Scan text for AI patterns, review highlights, and export reports
ZeroGPT offers web-based AI-text detection with highlighted sentences, batch file uploads, and downloadable PDF reports. Its site also lists writing utilities and access through WhatsApp and Telegram, making it a simple detector-first option rather than an education-only workflow.
更新日
2026-10-26
対応プラットフォーム
Web / API / WhatsApp / Telegram
無料
The official homepage presents its AI detector as free, but the captured page did not disclose usage quotas or paid-plan details; check the live site before budgeting for ongoing team use.
* 料金は参考情報です。最新の料金は公式サイトをご確認ください
Submit writing for a first-pass check of patterns associated with AI-generated text before deciding whether further review is needed.
Review highlighted sentences to see which parts of a document contributed to the detector's findings.
Upload multiple files for automatic checking from the dashboard instead of submitting each document separately.
Download a PDF report for each detection and use listed WhatsApp or Telegram access for supported tools.
Run a quick check on a draft and review highlighted sentences before sharing the work with an editor or client.
Upload several files for batch scanning and keep PDF reports for internal review or follow-up.
Access listed detection and writing utilities through WhatsApp or Telegram when a browser workflow is inconvenient.
クイックスタート
Submit one representative passage first and review its highlighted sentences before uploading a larger batch.
When checking several files, use batch upload and save the generated PDF report for later review.
Use the listed WhatsApp or Telegram access for a short check when away from the dashboard.
実践のコツ
Core tip: Use the highlighted sentences to guide questions, not to label a writer. Do keep the original text and its context; don't assume the score explains how a passage was produced. For team decisions, pair the PDF report with source drafts and a consistent human review.
No. A detector result is an estimate, not proof of authorship, and the captured site does not establish a universal threshold for decisions. Review the highlighted text with its context and other writing evidence.
No. A report records scan findings but does not preserve the complete writing process or explain every edit. Keep the original document and revision history when they matter to a review.
Keep the report as one reference, compare the flagged passages with available drafts, and ask the author for context. Agree on a human review process before using detector output in consequential decisions.
このツールが合わない場合は、次の代替候補をご覧ください